INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS FINANCE TIME CONSTRAINED ASSESSMENT
Business Finance Questions and Investment Appraisal
This business finance assessment covers financial accounting principles, financial statements, profitability ratios, budgeting, costing, depreciation, and digital finance. It includes multiple-choice questions and case studies involving Amazon Ltd and Vipers Ltd, providing practical assignment help with financial analysis. The worked examples apply ratio analysis, average rate of return, payback periods, and net present value to investment decisions.
Part A: Short-Answer Type Questions
i) Business Entity Convention
The Business Entity Convention states that the business and its owner are treated as separate and distinct entities. Correct Answer: Business Entity Convention
ii) Financial Reporting Period
Financial statements normally report financial information for a one-year accounting period. Correct Answer: 1-year period
iii) Sales or Revenue
Revenue is the economic benefit earned from selling goods or services during an accounting period.
Revenue = Selling Price per Unit × Units Sold
Correct Answer: Sales / Revenue
iv) Statement of Financial Position
SOFP stands for Statement of Financial Position. It reports an entity's assets, liabilities and equity at a specific date. Correct Answer: Statement of Financial Position
v) Meaning of SOFP
A Statement of Financial Position shows what an entity owns and owes, together with the owner's equity, at a specific date.
vi) Return on Capital Employed
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) measures operating profit in relation to the capital employed by a business.
ROCE = Operating Profit ÷ Capital Employed × 100
vii) Digitisation
Digitisation can create challenges involving data protection, cybercrime, regulation and access for people with limited digital skills.
viii) Cost Driver
A cost driver is a factor that causes or influences the cost of an activity or overhead.
ix) Break-Even Analysis for CLR Ltd
CLR Ltd has fixed costs of £500, variable costs of £7 per unit and a selling price of £11 per unit.
Contribution = £11 − £7 = £4 per unit
Break-even Point = £500 ÷ £4 = 125 units
Answer: 125 units
x) Break-Even Analysis for Tesla Ltd
Raw materials cost £3 per car. Labour costs £20 per hour, and each car requires 15 minutes of labour.
Labour Cost = 15 ÷ 60 × £20 = £5
Total Variable Cost = £3 + £5 = £8
Contribution = £12 − £8 = £4
Break-even Point = £450 ÷ £4 = 112.5 cars
Answer: 113 cars to reach or exceed break-even.
xi) Annual Depreciation
The vehicle costs £20,000, has a residual value of £4,000 and a useful life of four years.
Annual Depreciation = (£20,000 − £4,000) ÷ 4 = £4,000
xii) Payment in Advance
When three months of rent is paid but only two months belong to the current accounting period, the remaining month's rent is recorded as a prepayment.
xiii) Agency Theory
Agency theory recognises that managers may prioritise their own interests rather than the interests of the organisation or its owners.
xiv) Operating Leases
Operating leases allow a business to use an asset without purchasing it outright. The accounting treatment depends on the applicable accounting standards.
xv) Secured Bonds
Secured bonds are backed by specified collateral, which can reduce the lender's risk of loss if the borrower defaults.
xvi) Flexible Budget
Fixed costs generally remain unchanged when a budget is flexed within the relevant activity range.
xvii) Beyond Budgeting
Beyond Budgeting emphasises decentralised decision-making, team responsibility, organisational vision and adaptability.
xviii) Average Rate of Return
The Average Rate of Return method uses accounting profit to assess the profitability of an investment.
xix) Average Investment
Average Investment = (Initial Investment + Scrap Value) ÷ 2
= (£10,000 + £4,000) ÷ 2 = £7,000
xx) Blockchain Records
Blockchain consensus mechanisms can help network participants agree on valid transactions and maintain consistent records.
Part B: Case Study 1 — Ratio Analysis for Amazon Ltd
a) Financial Ratio Calculations
The following table presents the financial ratios calculated using the figures provided for Amazon Ltd.
| Financial Ratio | Formula | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | Gross Profit ÷ Net Sales × 100 | 25,200 ÷ 42,000 × 100 | 60% |
| Net Profit Margin | Net Profit ÷ Net Sales × 100 | 13,200 ÷ 42,000 × 100 | 31.43% |
| Current Ratio | Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities | 9,300 ÷ 3,900 | 2.38:1 |
| Quick Ratio | (Current Assets − Inventory) ÷ Current Liabilities | (9,300 − 1,400) ÷ 3,900 | 2.03:1 |
| Trade Receivables Turnover | Net Credit Sales ÷ Average Receivables | 42,000 ÷ 7,900 | 5.32 times |
| Trade Payables Turnover | Credit Purchases ÷ Average Payables | 16,800 ÷ 3,400* | 4.94 times* |
| Inventory Turnover | Cost of Goods Sold ÷ Average Inventory | 16,800 ÷ 1,400* | 12 times* |
The current and quick ratios suggest that current assets exceed current liabilities. However, the quality of receivables, the timing of payments and the nature of inventory should also be considered when evaluating liquidity. A receivables turnover ratio of approximately 5.32 times corresponds to around 69 days to collect receivables, assuming the input data are representative. The estimated inventory turnover of 12 times corresponds to approximately 30 days of inventory on hand. Note: The turnover calculations marked with an asterisk use the balances supplied as proxies because opening and closing balances were not provided. Actual average balances and credit purchases should be used for more reliable results.
Part B: Case Study 2 — Investment Appraisal for Vipers Ltd
Investment Cash-Flow Information
| Cash Flow | Proposal 1 (£) | Proposal 2 (£) | Proposal 3 (£) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Investment | 120,000 | 95,000 | 80,000 |
| Year 1 | 80,000 | 10,000 | 30,000 |
| Year 2 | 60,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 |
| Year 3 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 30,000 |
| Year 4 | 20,000 | 60,000 | 30,000 |
| Year 5 Operating Cash Flow | 40,000 | 50,000 | 20,000 |
| Scrap Proceeds | 4,000 | 5,000 | 8,000 |
a) Average Rate of Return (ARR)
ARR measures average annual accounting profit as a percentage of the investment amount. The calculations below use initial investment as the denominator.
Annual Depreciation = (Initial Investment − Scrap Value) ÷ 5
Average Annual Profit = Average Annual Operating Cash Flow − Annual Depreciation
ARR = Average Annual Profit ÷ Initial Investment × 100
| Calculation | Proposal 1 | Proposal 2 | Proposal 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Operating Cash Inflows | 240,000 | 200,000 | 150,000 |
| Average Annual Cash Flow | 48,000 | 40,000 | 30,000 |
| Annual Depreciation | 23,200 | 18,000 | 14,400 |
| Average Annual Profit | 24,800 | 22,000 | 15,600 |
| Initial Investment | 120,000 | 95,000 | 80,000 |
| ARR | 20.67% | 23.16% | 19.50% |
Proposal 2 has the highest ARR at approximately 23.16% when initial investment is used as the denominator. ARR conventions vary, so the denominator required by the course should be confirmed.
b) Payback Period
The payback period measures how long it takes for cumulative cash inflows to recover the initial investment.
Payback Period = Full Years Before Recovery + (Unrecovered Investment at Start of Year ÷ Cash Inflow During Recovery Year)
| Period | Proposal 1 (£) | Proposal 2 (£) | Proposal 3 (£) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 Cumulative | 80,000 | 10,000 | 30,000 |
| Year 2 Cumulative | 140,000 | 50,000 | 70,000 |
| Year 3 Cumulative | 180,000 | 90,000 | 100,000 |
| Year 4 Cumulative | 200,000 | 150,000 | 130,000 |
| Year 5 Cumulative (excluding scrap) | 240,000 | 200,000 | 150,000 |
| Payback Period | 1.67 years | 3.08 years | 2.33 years |
Proposal 1 has the shortest payback period, at approximately 1.67 years. Proposal 3 recovers its investment in approximately 2.33 years, while Proposal 2 takes approximately 3.08 years.
c) Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%
NPV discounts future cash flows to their present value and deducts the initial investment. Year 5 cash flow includes the relevant scrap proceeds.
NPV = Sum of [Cash Flow in Year t ÷ (1 + 0.15)t] − Initial Investment
| Year | Discount Factor | Proposal 1 PV (£) | Proposal 2 PV (£) | Proposal 3 PV (£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.869565 | 69,565 | 8,696 | 26,087 |
| 2 | 0.756144 | 45,369 | 30,246 | 30,246 |
| 3 | 0.657516 | 26,301 | 26,301 | 19,725 |
| 4 | 0.571753 | 11,435 | 34,305 | 17,153 |
| 5 (including scrap) | 0.497177 | 21,876 | 27,345 | 13,921 |
| Total PV of Inflows | — | 174,546 | 126,893 | 107,132 |
| Initial Investment | — | (120,000) | (95,000) | (80,000) |
| NPV | — | 54,546 | 31,893 | 27,132 |
d) Investment Recommendation
Based on ARR, Proposal 2 performs best, with an estimated return of 23.16%. Based on payback, Proposal 1 is preferred because it recovers the initial investment fastest. Proposal 1 also has the highest NPV, approximately £54,546, compared with £31,893 for Proposal 2 and £27,132 for Proposal 3. Assuming the projects are mutually exclusive and the cash-flow estimates are comparable, Proposal 1 is the preferred choice because it is expected to create the greatest value at a 15% cost of capital.
References
- Barrow, C. (2011). Practical Financial Management. Kogan Page Publishers.
- Cunha, F.A.F. de S., Meira, E. and Orsato, R.J. (2021). “Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda.” Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp. 3821–3838. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2842.
- McLaney, E. and Atrill, P. (2023). Accounting and Finance: An Introduction. 11th ed. Pearson Education Limited.
- Steffy, W., Zearley, T. and Strunk, J. (2018). Financial Ratio Analysis: An Effective Management Tool. Industrial Development Division, Institute of Science and Technology, University of Michigan.
- Szydlowska, K. (2018). Ratio Analysis. Financial Position of a Company. GRIN Verlag.
- Woodhall, G. and Stuttard, A. (2023). Financial Management. Macmillan.
- Yuliarto Nugroho, B. (2020). “The Effect of Book to Market Ratio, Profitability, and Investment on Stock Return.” International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 7(6), pp. 102–107. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/ijems-v7i6p114.
Unlock Full Sample
Enter your details to view the complete sample for free.
Academic Integrity Policy
This model solution is provided free of charge to serve as a structure reference guide for research, planning, or referencing formatting study. It should not be submitted directly as your own final coursework.
